Say Hello at AIPAD

As most of you certainly know, the rest of this week/weekend is the once a year AIPAD Photography Show here in New York. We’re planning the same in-depth booth by booth coverage you’ve come to expect.

Whether you are a collector (large or small), curator, auction house specialist, photographer, book publisher, critic, fellow blogger, or whoever, if you are a regular reader here, I’d enjoy meeting you at the fair, if only for a few moments to look you in the eye, shake your hand, and get your feedback on how we can improve this site. I plan to be at the fair a good portion of Thursday afternoon, likely part of Friday afternoon as well, and at the opening tonight. Shoot me an email at info@dlkcollection.com and hopefully we can find a time to say hello.

Baron Adolph de Meyer @Robert Miller

JTF (just the facts): A total of 91 works, variously framed and matted (some in elaborate period frames with linen mats), and hung throughout the entire gallery (a series of 5 rooms and hallways). Virtually all of the images are portraits. The prints are mostly vintage, taken throughout De Meyer’s career, beginning in 1897 and ending in 1940. The print sizes are all intimate, ranging between 4×3 and 14×11. While most of the prints are gelatin silver prints, there are other processes represented in the exhibit as well: albumen, pigment, platinum, and platinum palladium. There is also one glass case containing portraits of the artist. (Installation shots at right.)

Comments/Context: Given the ubiquitous nature of fashion and celebrity culture today, the main reason to see this show is to step back in time and understand where it all got started. Baron Adolph De Meyer was the first staff photographer for both Vogue and Vanity Fair and his luxurious images of society ladies and film stars of the early 1900s paved the way for the explosion that has come since.
.
De Meyer’s images were made in the soft-focus Pictorialist style of the times, with a heavy dose of Edwardian aristocratic glamour. His subjects outfitted themselves in a wide spectrum of old world finery, oriental exotica, and risque new Art Deco frocks; there are mountains of feathers, flowers, and lace, billowing formal ball gowns, furs, jewels, and over-the-top fabulous hats. Virtually all of the women are lit from behind (with the light in their hair), artfully posing in windows and doorways or in seen in profile in staged interior scenes, hands extended or folded just so. Vanderbilts, Havemeyers, and Isabella Stewart Gardner are mixed in with Josephine Baker, Nijinsky and a parade of now-forgotten actresses, the wealthy and the famous placed on equal footing, for the adoration of the masses.

An exhibit like this cannot avoid having a bit of a dated, period piece feel to it, but there are plenty of echoes and connections to the pages of our current fashion magazines that make this show more than just an interesting time capsule. When De Meyer gets it just right, his portraits have a timeless grace and elegance (with a touch of surprising modernism) that rivals the best of what has been produced since.
Collector’s POV: The prints in this show are priced quite differently based on the process in use. The gelatin silver prints range between $5000 and $63500. The platinum and platinum palladium prints start at $16000 and continue up to $160000. The albumen prints are either $19000 or $19500, and the one pigment print is $260000. There are 11 prints that are marked “not for sale”.
De Meyer’s work has been only intermittently available at auction in the past few years, with a wide range in prices based on the rarity of the lots on offer. Lesser known works have recently gone for as little as $2000, while just last Fall, a platinum print of Water Lilies went for $170000 at Christie’s.
Rating: * (one star) GOOD (rating system described here)
.
Transit Hub:

  • NY Times T magazine (here), Style.com (here)
  • Book: A Singular Elegance, 1994 (here)

Baron Adolph de Meyer
Through April 3rd

Robert Miller Gallery
524 West 26th Street
New York, NY 10001

Pieter Hugo, Nollywood @Yossi Milo

JTF (just the facts): A total of 10 large scale color photographs, framed in white with no matting, and hung in the single room gallery space. All of the works are digital c-prints, taken in Nigeria in 2008 and 2009. The prints come in two sizes: 68×68, in editions of 5, and 44×44, in editions of 9; there are 2 large prints and 8 smaller prints in this show. A monograph of this body of work was published by Prestel in 2009. (Installation shots at right.)
.
Comments/Context: It seems that almost immediately after Pieter Hugo’s Nollywood series was published in book form last year, strong opinions started to form on both sides of the work. After following some of the online debate and controversy last Fall (some of it linked below), I was eager to see the images in person and come to my own conclusions based on first hand experience of the prints themselves.
.
The series is drawn from the busy Nigerian film industry, and depicts a variety of actors and actresses in macabre scenes: a nude man poses in a Darth Vader mask, a man in a suit stands over the bloody carcass of a water buffalo, a nude woman has a machete stuck in the middle of her chest, a man in a top hat and tails with white circles around his eyes sits in a junkyard, a man with a white mask and fake ears stands in an overcoat wielding an ax.
.
The reactions to these images have been polarized primarily based on questions of documentary truth and intent. For those who see these works as valid depictions of Nigerian culture (or of African culture more generally), charges of exploitation, racism, caricature, and the ignorance of the white man’s gaze have all been leveled against Hugo. For those who see the works as merely yet another example of complex staged fictions, many have found these portraits extremely powerful, with a strange and disturbing intensity.
.
To my eye, these works most resemble film stills from slasher movies, amplified and composed for maximum effect. They have an otherness that mixes horror with an underlying dose of grotesque comedy; strange (and perhaps unknowable) things are clearly going on, depicted with equal parts fear, black humor, and bloody gore. I am in no position to judge with a sense of anthropological correctness whether these images capture Nigerian myths, symbols, or spiritual stories with any fidelity, but I certainly didn’t read this as an even handed documentary study. These portraits are weird, wild, and melodramatic fictions that take us to shocking and surreal fantasy worlds, and I’m not offended if the artist took some liberties in exaggerating their details to generate more emotional impact.
.
As I left the gallery, I was thinking about the inversion of this story and how it might play out. What if well-crafted stylized portraits and scenes of Hollywood horror actors were made and shown in African art galleries; how would the audience respond, given a different cultural context? Would they find them strange and powerful, revolting and disgusting, or just plain puzzling? In the end, I think we see fictions like Hugo’s through our own particular cultural lens and history. As such, I saw these works as over-the-top and strangely different versions of universal stories and tales, making them jarring and thought-provoking in new and unexpected ways.

Collector’s POV: The prints in this show are priced based on size. The 68×68 prints are $14000 each, while the 44×44 prints are $9500 each. Hugo’s work has not really reached the secondary markets in any consistent way to date, so gallery retail is likely the only real option for interested collectors at this point.

Rating: * (one star) GOOD (rating system described here)

Transit Hub:

  • Artist site (here)
  • Politics, Theory & Photography (here), Amy Stein (here), Heading East (here)
  • Book review: Foto8 (here)

Pieter Hugo, Nollywood
Through April 10th

Yossi Milo Gallery
525 West 25th Street
New York, NY 10001

Auction Preview: SEX, March 19, 2010 @Phillips London

Phillips continues its themed sales in London later this week with an auction bluntly entitled SEX. Running the gamut from artful nudes to explicit close-ups, photography is a cornerstone of this sale: out of a total of 221 lots on offer from all mediums, 137 are photographs (more than 60%). Overall, the Total High Estimate for the photography lots is £672500. (Catalog cover at right, via Phillips.)

Here’s the breakdown:

Total Low Lots (high estimate up to and including £5000): 110
Total Low Estimate (sum of high estimates of Low lots): £264500

Total Mid Lots (high estimate between £5000 and £25000): 21
Total Mid Estimate: £183000

Total High Lots (high estimate above £25000): 6
Total High Estimate: £225000

The top lot by High estimate is lot 124, Pierre et Gilles, Tiger, 2007, at £40000-60000.

Here is the list of photographers who are represented by three or more lots in the sale (with the number of lots in parentheses):

Helmut Newton (8)
Pierre Moliner (7)
Nobuyoshi Araki (6)
Noritoshi Hirakawa (6)
Bob Carlos Clarke (4)
Robert Mapplethorpe (4)
Hugo Markl (4)
Daido Moriyama (4)
Terry Richardson (4)
Merry Alpern (3)
Sante D’Orazio (3)
Nan Goldin (3)
Pamela Hanson (3)
Les Krims (3)
Rankin (3)
Miroslav Tichy (3)

The complete lot by lot catalog can be found here.

SEX
March 19th

Phillips De Pury & Company
Howick Place
London SW1P 1BB

Robert Adams, Summer Nights, Walking @Marks

JTF (just the facts): A total of 45 black and white photographs, framed in white and matted, and hung in the large second floor gallery space, separated by a dividing wall. Nearly all of the prints are vintage gelatin silver prints, sized between 5×5 and 15×15. No edition information was available. The images were taken primarily in the suburbs of Denver and Boulder (Colorado) in the period between 1976 and 1983. A monograph of this body of work was originally published by Aperture in 1985 and entitled Summer Nights; this exhibition has been organized to coincide with the rerelease of the book, in an expanded and resequenced edition entitled Summer Nights, Walking (here). (Installation shots at right.)

Comments/Context: We’ve had a copy of Summer Nights in our photobook library since the very beginning of our lives as photography collectors; it sits among a shelf full of Adams’ books and essays, likely wedged in somewhere near The New West and Denver. In the past, I thought of the Summer Nights work as a direct extension of Adams’ daytime images of environmental mismanagement and the encroachment of poorly planned suburban development. Without really looking (or with a preconceived conclusion in mind), I assumed the harshness of his tract houses, construction sites, and scrub lands would be applied with the same unflinching commentary to his nighttime scenes. As a result, I only saw what I thought I was supposed to see: the ugliness of the wincing glare of the street lights, the sidewalks bordered by unruly weeds, the empty parking lots, and the depressing ranch houses engulfed in shadows.
It is with a great deal of surprise that I must now admit that I had it all wrong. In visiting this fine exhibit, my overwhelming reaction to seeing the pictures in person was how gentle they consistently are. While Adams’ compositions are not beautiful in any traditional sense, I found plenty of moments of grace, especially in the way that leaves and wildflowers catch the light or the way silhouettes are framed against the moonlit sky. The dramatic shadows that leak across the sidewalk or cover the sides of houses and garages with dappled patterns are no longer particularly ominous or hostile; I saw them more as moments of goose bump inducing shivers, even though the warmth of the night air surrounds you.
What I thought of most in seeing these works is that Adams has captured the American suburban equivalent of the Italian passegiata. What is perhaps sad is that this nighttime walk in an America boom town is such a lonely and desolate one: there are no people on the streets to stop and greet, no places to go to relax and leisurely enjoy the warm night air – we’ve built a world designed around car transportation, so walking in these places has become a kind of oddity. And yet Adams has found plenty of subtle joys in these solitary neighborhood walks: the playful lights of a carnival ride, the texture of a tree trunk, the reflections of windows or puddles, the pinpricks of lights in the distance, or an expanse of pavement against an enveloping blackness.
As I looked more closely, I started to notice just how masterful Adams’ use of the available light really is: moonlight and ambient light from the surrounding city is mixed with up-close glare of the streetlights to create depth and distance without resorting to night photography cliches; the range of tonalities is both quietly meditative and breathtakingly exquisite. These pictures are soft and still, and some effort is required to unlock their pleasures; a quick gallery fly by certainly will result in a wash of small, unmemorable dark pictures, while a deeper exploration will uncover a body of work that is remarkably varied and consistently well crafted.
I don’t want to give the impression that Adams’ commitment to the issues/problems of land use and suburban development isn’t to be found in these pictures; it’s certainly there if you want to go looking for it. But the revelation for me in this exhibit was that those complex issues could recede into the background a bit (the volume could be turned down), and that an unexpected loveliness and simplicity could be found underneath. There is a nostalgic warmth in his style here that is an excellent reminder that there is much more tender nuance to the art of Robert Adams than the New Topographics categorization might lead us to believe.
Collector’s POV: The prints in this show are priced between $8500 and $38000. Adams’ work has become increasingly available in the secondary markets in the past decade, with prices creeping upward over time, typically ranging between $5000 and $50000.
.
Rating: *** (three stars) EXCELLENT (rating system described here)
Transit Hub:
  • Reviews: New Yorker (here), John Haber (here), New York Photo Review (here)
Through April 17th
523 West 24th Street
New York, NY 10011

Auction Results: First Open Post-War and Contemporary Art, March 11, 2010 @Christie’s New York

In contrast to the lackluster performance at Sotheby’s a few days earlier, the results for the photography lots at Christie’s First Open Post-War and Contemporary Art sale were stellar. With a buy-in rate less than 10% and some help from Barbara Kruger, the total sale proceeds for photography soared well above the estimate range.

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):

Total Lots: 22
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: $558000
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: $792000
Total Lots Sold: 20
Total Lots Bought In: 2
Buy In %: 9.09%
Total Sale Proceeds: $895375

Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 4
Low Sold: 4
Low Bought In: 0
Buy In %: 0.00%
Total Low Estimate: $35000
Total Low Sold: $92500

Mid Total Lots: 15
Mid Sold: 13
Mid Bought In: 2
Buy In %: 13.33%
Total Mid Estimate: $397000
Total Mid Sold: $339375

High Total Lots: 3
High Sold: 3
High Bought In: 0
Buy In %: 0.00%
Total High Estimate: $360000
Total High Sold: $463500

There were three lots tied for the top photography lot by High estimate: lot 13, Cindy Sherman, Untitled #194, 1980, at $90000-120000, which sold for $98500; lot 17, Barbara Kruger, Untitled (Your every wish is our command), 1982, at $80000-120000, which was the top outcome of the sale and sold for $278500 (image at right, via Christie’s); and lot 105, Chuck Close, Nat (Five color studies), 1971, at $80000-120000, which sold for $86500.

90.00% of the lots that sold had proceeds in or above the estimate range. There were a total of four surprises in this sale (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate):

Lot 2, Gerhard Richter, Guildenstern, 1998, at $25000
Lot 17, Barbara Kruger, Untitled (Your every wish is our command), 1982, at $278500
Lot 50, Lucas Samaras, Photo-Transformations, 1973-1976, at $32500
Lot 110, Thomas Struth, Grab von Lu Xun, Shanghai, 1997, at $25000

Complete lot by lot results can be found here.

Christie’s
20 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020

Candida Höfer, Florence and Naples @Sonnabend

JTF (just the facts): A total of 7 large scale works, framed in blond wood with no matting, and hung in the entry and the center room in the rear of the gallery. The c-prints range in size from roughly 75×61 to 80×102 and are made in editions of 7. All of the negatives are from 2008 and 2009, and were taken in Florence and Naples. A monograph of this body of work (entitled Napoli) has recently been published by Schirmer/Mosel (here). (Installation shots at right.)

Comments/Context: After years of seeing shows of Candida Höfer’s images of ornate public spaces and interiors and thinking they all looked generally the same, this exhibit of recent work from Florence and Naples made me think quite a bit more deeply about her artistic approach. For the first time, I got beyond the documentary novelty/awe of the over-the-top constructions and ornamentations themselves, and started to think about these pictures as a kind of nuanced portraiture, to see the artist’s style more clearly layered over the subtleties of architectural personality.
In a certain way, these Italian pictures look like any number of other pictures she has taken previously: formal rooms, frescoed ceilings, checkerboard marble floors, classical sculpture, cherubs, flashy chandeliers, and rows of columns. There are impressive palaces, ballrooms, entry halls and libraries, all designed as overt signals of wealth, power, and status. Each is entirely empty of people, the polished floors reflecting the pure white light which pours quietly in through the windows.
I guess it was the simple thought exercise of comparing these images to how I would expect these same famous rooms to look on post cards in the nearby gift shops that started me down a more complicated reading of these photographs; when they’re printed large and hung as individual objects, it’s sometimes easy to just get lost in the grandeur of the prints and forget to think about the subtle differences in composition, framing, or lighting that Höfer has employed.
If we looked at a series of Avedon or Penn portraits, all taken with monochrome backgrounds and frontal poses, we wouldn’t say they all looked the same; we’d see the tiny gestures that have been captured that make the people individuals, and we’d see the overlay of the photographer’s approach augmenting the exploration of these often hidden features. The same is true here: I suddenly became aware of how the square framing had been used to better capture the elongated decorated ceilings, or how the curves of a chandelier were carefully placed to interact with the balconies of a double height room. I also saw how Höfer had highlighted the cluster of modern plastic chairs that were set up in one of the ballrooms and realized how they formed a surprising juxtaposition to the ornate religious frescoes and gold leaf on the walls and ceilings. Even the David (perhaps the most cliched subject imaginable, often seen looking up at its magnificence) was photographed in an unexpected way that made the immense statue look more vulnerable, the grandeur of the domed glass atrium in which it stands dwarfing the iconic sculpture.
All in, I was much less distracted by the grand locations themselves in this body of work, and as a result, saw much more of Höfer’s aesthetic approach than I have noticed previously. I’ve come to the conclusion that Höfer’s work cannot be appreciated via the normal “stand for 5 seconds and move on” approach to gallery hopping; it requires the patience to let the initial eye-catching drama dissipate and dissolve a little, so that the more subtle details of the photographic craft can come though.
Collector’s POV: The prints in this show are priced between 45000 and 50000€, based on size. Höfer’s work is readily available in the secondary markets, in a variety of dimensions and edition sizes. Smaller pieces can be found well under $10000 (often in editions of up to 100), while the larger works (printed in much smaller editions, usually 6) range between $20000 and $50000, with a few outliers even higher.
Rating: * (one star) GOOD (rating system described here)
Transit Hub:
  • Architecture of Absence, ICA UPenn, 2006 (here)
  • NY Times review, 2004 (here)
Candida Höfer, Florence and Naples
Through April 17th
Sonnabend Gallery (artnet page here)
536 West 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011

Auction Results: Contemporary Art, March 9, 2010 @Sotheby’s New York

Given the soft performance of Sotheby’s post fair week Contemporary Art sale, it appears that collectors must have spent their money in the booths and then went home. With a buy-in rate for photography near 50%, it is no surprise that the total photo proceeds fell under the estimate range, even with a Cindy Sherman film still (at right) pulling in some extra dollars. The mid range lots were particularly weak, with only 12 of 30 in that price zone finding buyers.

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):

Total Lots: 49
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: $678500
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: $971000
Total Lots Sold: 25
Total Lots Bought In: 24
Buy In %: 48.98%
Total Sale Proceeds: $583251

Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 16
Low Sold: 11
Low Bought In: 5
Buy In %: 31.25%
Total Low Estimate: $113000
Total Low Sold: $68501

Mid Total Lots: 30
Mid Sold: 12
Mid Bought In: 18
Buy In %: 60.00%
Total Mid Estimate: $608000
Total Mid Sold: $252500

High Total Lots: 3
High Sold: 2
High Bought In: 1
Buy In %: 33.33%
Total High Estimate: $250000
Total High Sold: $262250

The top photography lot by High estimate was lot 89, Cindy Sherman, Untitled Film Still #63, 1980, at $80000-120000; it was also the top outcome of the sale at $218500 (image at right top, via Sotheby’s).

84.00% of the lots that sold had proceeds above or in the estimate range. There was only one surprise in this sale (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate):

Lot 100, Andres Serrano, Discobolo (Piss Series), 1988, at $34375

Complete lot by lot results can be found here.

Sotheby’s
1334 York Avenue
New York, NY 10021

Auction Results: NOW, March 6, 2010 @Phillips New York

Last Saturday, Phillips began its 2010 series of themed sales with NOW: Art of the 21st Century. The top two photo lots failed to sell and the photo buy-in rate was up over 35%, together leading the total sale proceeds for photography to come in under the estimate range.

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):
Total Lots: 80
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: $403900
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: $569900
Total Lots Sold: 50
Total Lots Bought In: 30
Buy In %: 37.50%
Total Sale Proceeds: $364251
Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 66
Low Sold: 41
Low Bought In: 25
Buy In %: 37.88%
Total Low Estimate: $276900
Total Low Sold: $192376
Mid Total Lots: 14
Mid Sold: 9
Mid Bought In: 5
Buy In %: 35.71%
Total Mid Estimate: $293000
Total Mid Sold: $171875
High Total Lots: 0
High Sold: NA
High Bought In: NA
Buy In %: NA
Total High Estimate: $0
Total High Sold: NA

The top lots by High estimate were lot 205, Olafur Eliasson, Nine Works: Landscapes, 1995, and lot 158, Paul Pfeiffer, Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse 10, 2004, 2004, both at $30000-40000; both of these lots failed to sell. The top outcome of the sale was lot 129, Marilyn Minter, Sparks, 2002, at $47500 (image at right, via Phillips).

84.00% of the lots that sold had proceeds above or in the estimate range. There were a total of four surprises in this sale (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate):

Lot 12, Vik Muniz, Gummy Bears, 2002, at $13125
Lot 129, Marilyn Minter, Sparks, 2002, at $47500
Lot 130, Ryan McGinley, Laura (Thunderstorm), 2007, at $8125
Lot 131, Paul Rusconi, Untitled (Blue Kate), 2007, at $20000

Complete lot by lot results can be found here.
Phillips De Pury & Company
450 West 15th Street
New York, NY 10011

Auction Results: Contemporary Art Evening Sale, March 4, 2010 @Phillips New York

Phillips’ Contemporary Art sale last week (during the frenzy of New York art fairs) only had 5 lots of photography on offer. The top lot in this small group failed to sell, and as a result, the total photo proceeds missed the estimate range by a decent margin.

The summary statistics are below (all results include the buyer’s premium):

Total Lots: 5
Pre Sale Low Total Estimate: $415000
Pre Sale High Total Estimate: $595000
Total Lots Sold: 4
Total Lots Bought In: 1
Buy In %: 20.00%
Total Sale Proceeds: $298100

Here is the breakdown (using the Low, Mid, and High definitions from the preview post, here):

Low Total Lots: 0
Low Sold: NA
Low Bought In: NA
Buy In %: NA
Total Low Estimate: $0
Total Low Sold: NA

Mid Total Lots: 1
Mid Sold: 1
Mid Bought In: 0
Buy In %: 0.00%
Total Mid Estimate: $35000
Total Mid Sold: $35000

High Total Lots: 4
High Sold: 3
High Bought In: 1
Buy In %: 25.00%
Total High Estimate: $560000
Total High Sold: $263100

The top lot by High estimate was lot 33, Gilbert & George, Friend Fear, 1983, at $150000-250000; it did not sell. The top outcome of the sale was lot 9, John Baldessari, Vertical Series: Attempt, 2003, at $98500. (Image at right, via Phillips.)

100.00% of the lots that sold had proceeds in the estimate range. There were no surprises in this sale (defined as having proceeds of at least double the high estimate).

Complete lot by lot results can be found here.

450 West 15th Street
New York, NY 10011

Photography at the 2010 ADAA Art Show

In contrast to the bustling chaotic supermarket of the Armory, the ADAA Art Show was a decidedly more serene affair. Most of the exhibitors opted for solo shows or tightly edited groups of work, meticulously hung against colored walls or linen wallpaper (no hand scrawled wall labels here). The overall mood was much more urbane and serious, the hushed voices appropriately reverent.

The photography displayed in this controlled environment was generally of very high quality; lots of big prices and top names, with a minimum of secondary clutter and distraction. Like our Armory posts, for each booth, a list of photographers has been provided, with the number of works on display in parentheses. Additional commentary, prices, editions, and pictures of the installation are also included where specific images stood out.

Fraenkel Gallery (here): Hiroshi Sugimoto (12). This booth was a sophisticated solo show of Sugimoto’s work, with a selection of images from a variety of different projects. There were 5 seascapes (4 small in a grid and 1 large), 2 lightning fields (1 small and 1 large), 2 theaters, 1 mechanical still life, 1 blurry building, and 1 Fox Talbot floral. This was the first time I had seen the lightning fields in person; up close the electricity branches out like the wash of a river, or feathers into delicate traceries. The large lightning field image (see below) was $80000 (and already sold); the small lightning field was $18000.



Weinstein Gallery (here): Alec Soth (14). This booth was a solo show, displaying Soth’s Fashion Magazine work from 2007. I have to say it was a totally unexpected and yet thoroughly pleasant (and appropriate) surprise to find Soth’s work in this rarefied environment. The work held its own with the rest of the art world elite arrayed nearby, and I imagine there were plenty of well heeled collectors in this crowd who had never heard of Soth but came away suitably impressed. All of the prints were pigmented ink prints, in editions of 7. There were three sizes on display (36×30, 40×48, and 58×48) with three sets of prices ($9000 or $10000, $13000, and $17500 respectively, helpfully printed right on the wall labels). In addition to the fashion project (which included the Chanel runway, Yves Saint Laurent’s dog, Sophia Loren, lavish meals and interiors, backstage fussing, and up close portraits), I was also able to see some of Soth’s mini-projects and recent commissions in a soft portfolio on the table. These included Goth women from the South, the Most Beautiful Woman in Georgia (the country), and the Loneliest Man in Missouri – there is a particularly poignant/sad image from this last project where the man sits in front of a birthday cake, flanked by a woman straight out of a strip club.



Howard Greenberg Gallery (here): Edward Weston (3), Charles Sheeler (1), Jacques-Henri Lartigue (1), Man Ray (2 rayographs), Laszlo Moholy-Nagy (1 photogram), Frantisek Drtikol (1 nude), Edward Steichen (1), Robert Frank (2), Saul Leiter (3 color images, 1 painted diptych), Miroslav Tichy (5), William Klein (1). This booth was a carefully selected group of vintage rarities. The stand out image for me among these astonishing treasures was the Sheeler stairway (priced at $600000, see below); I could have stood and looked at it all day. The elegant Weston still lifes were priced at $475000, $450000, and $190000. The 2 Man Ray rayographs were $390000 and $250000 respectively; the Moholy-Nagy was also $250000. The Drtikol nude was $90000.


Metro Pictures Gallery (here): Cindy Sherman (2), Olaf Breuning (1), Louise Lawler (1). The Sherman history portrait below was priced at $300000.

Skarstedt Gallery (here): Barbara Kruger (1), Richard Prince (1), Cindy Sherman (1). Both the Kruger and the Sherman were priced at $275000 (see below).


Barbara Mathes Gallery (here): Hiroshi Sugimoto (1). This was the single most expensive photograph I saw for sale during the entire week of fairs; it was priced at $650000.

Zabriskie Gallery (here): Alfred Stieglitz (3), Constantin Brancusi (1), Edward Steichen (1), Paul Strand (2). This booth was a tribute to 291, Alfred Stieglitz’ famous gallery. Drawings, prints and pages from the various gallery magazines were displayed, along with a selection of photographs. My favorite image was the platinum print of Taos by Strand (priced at $100000, see below).


Hans P. Kraus Jr. Fine Photographs (here): Edouard-Denis Baldus (1), Frederick Evans (2), Roger Fenton (2), Joseph Vicomte Vigieur (2), Felix Teynard (2), Gustave Le Gray (1), Alvin Langdon Coburn (1), Humphrey Lloyd Hime (2), Louis-Constant De Clercq (1), Carleton Watkins/Eadward Muybridge (1), Charles Negre (1), Erneste Benecke (1), William Henry Fox Talbot (2), Eugene Cuvelier (1), Dr. John Murray (2). This booth was an edited group show called The Horizon in 19th Century Photographs, and included a selection of images bisected by the line of the horizon. The most startling of these works was the print by Humphrey Lloyd Hime, where the land and horizon became solid areas of black and white, the black land decorated by a small skull and bones (priced at $95000 and already sold, see below).



Pace/MacGill Gallery (here): Brassai (1), Diane Arbus (1), Philip-Lorca DiCorcia (1), Paul Graham (1 series), Garry Winogrand (1), Weegee (1), Henri Cartier-Bresson (1), Robert Frank (1), Harry Callahan (1), Lucas Samaras (1). This booth was a collection of top tier images. I enjoyed seeing the large Brassai exhibition print out front (priced at $70000, see below) and the Callahan head from the 1950s.

McKee Gallery (here): Richard Learoyd (1)
David Zwirner Gallery (here): Christopher Williams (8). This was a solo booth, filled with Williams’ recent conceptual works (2007-2009). There were cut away cameras and lenses, upside down shoes on a large format camera, and socks being put on feet. Each of the prints was priced at $32000, in editions of 10+4.


Photography at the 2010 Armory, Part 6 of 6

This is the final part of our exhausting multi-part Armory review post. Hopefully, all of the details will be of use to collectors who want to follow up with specific galleries, or who just need a summary of the photography that was being shown. Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 can be found here (part 1), here (part 2), here (part 3), here (part 4) and here (part 5). This post refers to the booths at Pier 92.

Galerie Daniel Templon (here): James Casebere (2)

Locks Gallery (here): Eileen Neff (2)

Alan Cristea Gallery (here): Jan Dibbets (9), Boo Ritson (1). Having recently seen the Dibbets show at Gladstone, I was happy to run across this grid of Dibbets‘ color studies; they are bigger and bolder than I had imagined. The set is priced at $18500.

Wetterling Gallery (here): Doug & Mike Starn (8), Nathalia Edenmont (5). The Starn works are various views of a dense thicket of bamboo poles.

Springer & Winckler Galerie (here): Arnold Odermatt (8), Andy Goldsworthy (3), Bernd and Hilla Becher (15 as one typology), Sigmar Polke (3), Gerhard Richter (6 overpainted photographs), Bernhard Johannes Blume (2 diptychs), John Baldessari (1)

Galerie Michael Schultz (here): Gilbert & George (1)

Bruce Silverstein Gallery (here): Shinichi Maruyama (1), Randy West (16), Yao Lu (1), Martin Denker (1), Michael Wolf (4), Todd Hido (3), Maria Antoinetta Mameli (1), Ryan Weideman (9), Diane Arbus (1), Leonard Freed (3), Nathan Lyons (3), Rosalind Solomon (1), André Kertész (4 black and white, 3 Polaroids), Aaron Siskind (4 broken windows, 4 paint studies), Barbara Morgan (3), E.O. Hoppé (5), Alfred Stieglitz (1), Marvin Newman (2 color, 12 black and white, including a grid of manhole covers), Frank Paulin (4), Larry Silver (4), Walker Evans (2), and others. The Silverstein booth was a tribute to 100 years of photography in New York (1910 to 2010), with time periods marked out in paint underneath each section. I was surprised to see the two large Kertész prints (at right), as they were larger than any prints of his from Washington Square that I had ever seen. They were priced at $25000 and $20000 respectively. Silverstein also had two early Walker Evans architectural/railroad studies (from the late 1920s) which would fit well into our collection.

Faría Fábregas Galería (here): Marta Minujin (1)

Winter Works on Paper (here): Lee Friedlander (2), Weegee (4), Josef Sudek (1), Arthur Tress (1), Ralph Eugene Meatyard (2), James Casebere (1), Andre Villers (1), among many, many others, hung salon style.

Contessa Gallery (here): David Drebin (4), Chuck Close (2), Robert Rauschenberg (1)

Sicardi Gallery (here): Geraldo de Barros (8). These conceptual prints by de Barros were a discovery for me. The negatives were made in the late 1940s/early 1950s, and are full of gridded geometries and overlapping patterns. The prints are recent posthumous prints, made in editions of 15, priced between $8000 and $12000.

Gana Art (here): Jang Taewon (1 lightbox), Cindy Sherman (1 film still)

Mixografia (here): John Baldessari (1 set of 6 prints)

HackelBury Fine Art (here): Garry Fabian Miller (7), Pascal Kern (6), Doug & Mike Starn (1 triptych and 1)

Barry Friedman, Ltd. (here): Michael Eastman (5 interiors, 2 abstractions), Man Ray (2), Sally Mann (1), Hans Bellmer (1), Arno Rafael Minkkinen (2)
.
Alan Koppel Gallery (here): Constantin Brancusi (1), Harry Shunk (1), Robert Frank (2), Diane Arbus (1), Hiroshi Sugimoto (2 dioramas), Vik Muniz (1), Adam Fuss (1)

Yancey Richardson Gallery (here): Ed Ruscha (10 gas stations), Julius Shulman (1), Sebastião Salgado (1), Esko Mannikko (3), Sharon Core (2 still lifes), Andrew Moore (2), Hellen Van Meene (3), Barbara Kasten (5). The marginal picture at right doesn’t do justice to the intricacies of Kasten’s recent glass studies; light and shadow play across the layers of glass, creating a network of subtle lines. This particular image is priced at $10500, in an edition of 5.

JGM Galerie (here): Fred Wilson (5), Ion Grigorescu (3)

Marc Selwyn Fine Art (here): Richard Misrach (2)

David Klein Gallery (here): Liz Cohen (5)

Tomorrow: the last of our fair posts (until AIPAD), covering the 2010 ADAA Art Show.

Sign up for our weekly email newsletter

This field is required.