Joel Sternfeld, Oxbow Archive @Luhring Augustine

JTF (just the facts): 13 large scale color landscapes, approximately 5′ x 7′ each, shown in the entry, front, and two back rooms of the gallery. (see installation shot at right) In editions of 3, plus 2 APs. Negatives from 2005-2007, prints from 2008.

Comments/Context: It’s been more than 20 years since Joel Sternfeld produced the work for which he is best known, the series of unexpected, paradoxical, and surprising work from American Prospects. The word most associated with these pictures is “ironic”, as exemplified by the image of the firefighter picking out a pumpkin while a house burns in the background.

One of the interesting challenges for the mid-career artist is how to get beyond the work that made you famous; how do you continue to innovate, without repeating yourself or becoming bored. Often, this means heading deeper into more personal territory and taking some more risks with images that are less obviously appealing to the “market” that has developed around the early work. So if you go to this exhibit hoping to find a repeat of American Prospects, you will be left puzzled. But if you go without preconceptions, I think you will find this exhibit quite satisfying, in a low key, quiet way.

All of the images in the show were taken in Northampton, Massachusetts, through the seasons over a couple of years. These are landscapes, but not the majestic grand gestures of Ansel Adams. This is second growth scrub forest, river flats, and meadows of weeds, scenes perfectly reminiscent of the sometimes anonymous and deadening landscape of current day New England. The pictures are grouped into seasons, with rooms for summer and fall in the back, and winter/spring together in the main room.

But unlike the less than beautiful California landscapes of Robert Adams, there is a touching affection buried in these images. There is no irony here; in fact, there are no people at all and no clever juxtapositions. These are pictures of a local, who has taken the time to really see the landscape around him, even thought it might not fit the traditional definitions of beauty. This is a person who is noticing and enjoying the turning of the seasons, and selecting out those moments when the yarrow is high, or the river is frozen, or the warm spring light has finally come back after months of dismal grey. These pictures seem to me to be perfectly grounded in the thoughts and emotions of a 21st century world: what have development and global warming done to our traditional lands? how can we re-embrace the local world around us and reconnect to something more meaningful that consumerism? how can we get more in tune with the seasons and the local foods that grow in our communities? (A few Bill McKibben essays would be a nice pairing for this work.)

These pictures will not blow your hair back when you see them in the gallery. And whether they will stand up to the tests of time is still unknown. Perhaps they will be looked back on through the lens of heightened care for the world around us and seem emblematic of the thoughts of these times. Regardless, these pictures reflect the real sentiments of an artist who is watching the nuanced changes in the world around him. And for that, they should be praised.

Collector’s POV: The images are priced at $50000 each, which given their size and the prevailing market for Sternfeld’s work, seems about right for retail.

As an aside, as relatively anonymous collectors, we are used to receiving the frosty attitude of gallery staff, designed for the unwashed walk-ins. I was therefore pleasantly surprised to get not only a friendly greeting, but genuine enthusiasm for the work from the staff at Luhring Augustine. And when I inquired about the book published to coincide with the show and found they were already sold out, they went out of their way to offer me options for getting a copy later. Well done. Gallery folks out there, think of me as the mystery shopper at Burger King, checking to see if I get a hot meal and a clean bathroom. (For future reference, I am particularly annoyed by misdirection and sneakiness with the price list.) Luhring Augustine passed with flying colors, and made me eager for my next visit.

Rating: * (1 star) GOOD (rating system defined here)

Joel Sternfeld, Oxbow Archive
Through October 4th

Luhring Augustine
531 West 24th Street
New York, NY 10011

Books on Private Collections (Part 1)

As collectors ourselves, one of things we are consistently interested in is how other folks have gone about the process of collection building. Over the years, we’ve certainly met many collectors who are single minded and don’t care at all about what other collectors are doing; we fall at the other end of the spectrum – we’re very interested in how other collectors make their choices and how their collections have evolved over time. Perhaps this says something about our interest in the process of collecting; the learning, hunting, sifting, and selecting that is the back story to the artworks themselves. Not surprisingly, whenever we come across a book about a private collection, we buy it, not because there is any particular affinity between our collection/tastes and that of the author, but more to see how they went about it.

So today begins a two-part post on some of these collection books. As an aside, all of the books here are concerned with private, personal collections, not those built inside corporations, museums, or other more public entities. I’ve prepared a list of a dozen books that I think are particularly interesting – we’ll cover half today and half in the next post (sometime soon). Some are out of print, but I’d guess they’re all available on Abebooks or elsewhere on the Internet. I’ll tackle them in alphabetical order of the last name of the collector, rather than trying to order them in some other way.

For each book, I’ll take a look at the major themes or approaches taken by the collector and try to consider further how they went about their own process. It is clear that the process of making a book or exhibition catalogue cleans up many of the messy loose ends of collecting; less strong works are edited out, risks taken and mistakes made are often omitted. A clear narrative is told where the actual events might have been more circular or serendipitous. But I think there is still plenty to learn from each collection’s point of view, even if it is pared down and gussied up a bit. And just like in a museum, when you look around a specific room and try to pick the one picture you’d want to take home with you, I’ll select a handful of pictures from the collection that we’d love to have and that would fit well into what we are doing as collectors.

1.) From the Heart; The Power of Photography – A Collector’s Choice, Aperture, 1988

The is the personal collection of Sondra Gilman. It is a strong selection of Modernist and particularly Post-Modernist works, beginning in the early 1900s and continuing through until the present. There are no 19th century works in the book.

The book is divided into 5 sections:

Marking Time – this group is about images capturing a fleeting moment
Picturing Pictures – these works center around the ideas of appropriation and image selection
Uncommon Familiar – these are unusual still lives and portraits
The Divided Self – more portraits and images of people
Telling Tales – these pictures are about narrative

My guess is that these divisions are an artificial construct for the book/exhibit, but they do in some sense help focus how Gilman might have thought about pictures. This isn’t by any means a “greatest hits” collection – there are lots of lesser known or obscure images. But the editing eye that has selected these works was pretty consistent and strong, especially given that she was buying work that hadn’t already been canonized. She doesn’t appear to have been interested in an encyclopedic view of post-Modernism; rather she has carefully selected images here and there that are challenging, thought-provoking and beautiful.

My favorites here would be (acknowledging that this collection doesn’t match ours much):

  • Andre Kertez, Cyclist, 1948
  • Walker Evans, Roadside Gas Sign, 1929
  • Bill Brandt, East Sussex Coast, 1957 (nude)

By the way, there is a great shot of the staircase in their house, with the walls covered in pictures. How collectors hang their collections in their homes is another interesting topic.

2.) Degrees of Stillness; Photographs from the Manfred Heiting Collection, SK Stiftung Kultur, 1998

The Manfred Heiting collection has 5000+ works in it, so any particular catalogue is clearly reductive in terms of telling the whole story. The collection spans the entire history of photography, and seems to be a bit heavier on European photographers.

The particular sample of works found in this book are all built around the concepts of pairs, series, multiples, and interrelation. There are several works from a single artist, all part of the same body of work or from the same shooting session. There are photographs from different photographers working with similar subject matter. It is a selection full of echoes and recombinations.

My learnings from this book center around just how powerful these associations can be, and that pairing works together or grouping like images can dramatically increase the overall energy of the point of view. While a single image might be interesting, a grid of four, or a combination with something else may be even more intriguing.

Here my favorites were:

  • Peter Keetman, Ohne Titel, 1959 (striped building multiple
    exposure)
  • Berenice Abbott, 3 images of the Third Avenue Lines,
    1936
  • Bernd and Hilla Becher, Water Towers, 1978-1982

3.) Chorus of Light; Photographs from the Sir Elton John Collection, High Museum of Art, 2000

In the 1990s, Elton John was one of the most visible collectors in the photography market. From a standing start, he quickly built up a collection of several thousand pictures, routinely set auction records, and supported many new and emerging contemporary artists. This book is a catalogue from a show in his hometown of Atlanta, at the High Museum of Art.

As evidenced by this book (and I believe some of the works here have been sold off, so the collection is clearly evolving), John’s collection was/is dominated by fashion images, portraits (often of celebrities), and male nudes, with a strong mix of iconic, trophy pictures by the likes of Man Ray and Andre Kertesz. Irving Penn and Robert Mapplethorpe are represented in depth. I don’t believe there is any 19th century work.

While there were clearly some collectors of fashion photography before John, he really (for me) was the first major collector to collect fashion and related work in such a depth and breadth. I imagine there are those in the photography establishment who initially scoffed at some of the work he chose, but the end result is a remarkably consistent vision. Elton John is a flamboyant guy, and this collection isn’t meek and quiet; it’s large, loud and fresh. My conclusion from his collection is that taking more risks, especially with contemporary work, can be a good thing.

As far as favorites are concerned, I would choose:

  • Margaret Bourke-White, Radio Transmitting Tower, 1935
  • Margaret Bourke-White, Chrysler Building Spire, 1930
  • Aleksander Rodchenko, Shukov Tower, 1920s
  • Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, From Radio Tower, Berlin, 1928
  • Edward Weston, Nude, 1927 (knees)
  • Edward Weston, Nude, 1937

There are also some crazy shots of his home and the photographs on the walls in this book, well worth checking out.

4.) The Graham Nash Collection, Nash Press, 1978

The fact that this book was published in 1978 tells you something pretty important; Graham Nash was a very early collector, way ahead of his time. He was buying when no one else was. His collection seems to be centered on humanity, on storytelling, on images of people in surprising or evocative moments. It is almost entirely a 20th century collection, with no color photography included.

Since the ironic, self referencing, and challenging ideas of Post Modernism were still just emerging when this book was put out, this collection feels a little like a time capsule, taking you back to a time when all the images were true, the emotions real, and the issues meaningful. While there are images of death and other atrocities, none of them have the harshness of later work. This collector chose images of the beauty of people, in all forms.

Given the focus of this collection, there isn’t really a single image that would fit well into what we are doing (we have virtually no narrative pictures of people). Given all the greatest hits assembled here, it is a strong reminder that there really are an infinite number of ways to collect photography. I would be interested to learn how his collection has evolved since the publication of this book.

5.) Taking Place; Photographs from the Prentice & Paul Sack Collection, SFMOMA, 2005

The Sack collection began with the unifying subject matter theme of the built structure, and has evolved into a behemoth, spanning the entire history of photography (up until about 1975). Sack’s approach resonates with me strongly, as we too have defined a sand box that encompasses our collection, and those boundaries help define what to spend our time on. It’s easy to say that this approach is simplistic, but we have found that limits have forced us to focus and define our collection more fully and have prevented us for ending up with a grab bag of unrelated pictures. The collection has also tried to deliver on depth, with 8-12 pictures for each of the important photographers. Again, I like this kind of plan, even if you break the rules from time to time.

The collection catalogue breaks the Sack collection up into a handful of categories:

Beginnings – early photography
Territories – Grand Tour and 19th century travel images
North, South, East and West – 19th century America
Progress and Its Discontents – Pictorialism, 1900-1930s street life, FSA
The Modern Eye – Classic Modernism 1920-1940s
Inhabitants – People, inside and outside

Many of these categories don’t fit well with our particular collection, but the Modern Eye is almost a direct match. There are plenty of pictures in this group that we like. Here are a few that would fit for us, from across the collection:

  • Charles Sheeler, Side of White Barn, 1917
  • Margaret Bourke-White, Ammonia Storage Tanks, 1930
  • Martin Bruehl, Untitled (Grain Elevator), 1932
  • Ralph Steiner, Bank of New York, 1926
  • Germaine Krull, La Tour Eiffel, 1928
  • Alexander Rodchenko, Courtyard, 1928
  • Florence Henri, Paris, 1930
  • Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Helsinki, 1930
  • Art Sinsabaugh, Midwest Landscape #60, 1961
  • Ray Metzker, Philly Walk, 1965
  • Gordon Matta-Clark, New York City, 1972

6.) Beyond Time; Photographs from the Gary B. Sokol Collection, Israel Museum, 2006

The Sokol collection is perhaps my favorite collection that I have not seen in person. Since finding this book among the shelves at the Strand bookstore a year or two ago, I find that I am continually pulling it off the shelf. It is full of post-it notes and scraps of paper.

The collection (at least as shown in the catalogue) has two distinct parts:

  • 19th century images of buildings and trees
  • 20th century Modernism, both American and European, extending all the way into the 1970s

This collection reminds me of several important collecting ideas, which is why I think I continue to be interested in it:

  • Focus can be good, when it forces a narrowing of vision and a subsequent deepening of understanding of a particular sub-section of work
  • Great images (beyond the best known ones) can be found in the work of known and unknown artists if you take the time to look carefully and thoroughly
  • Resonance and interrelation of images are a byproduct of discipline in selecting works for a collection

For us, if you stripped out the 19th century work, which we find intellectually interesting, but not to our tastes, and left the Modernist work in the collection, we would enjoy having 95% of the images in our own collection; the consistency of quality is staggering. I can literally flip through this book and say, yes, yes, yes, yes, to page after page after page. (Compare this to Nash’s collection above where there wasn’t a single image that was a real fit.) What is exciting is that most of these aren’t well known images. So while we may know the photographer, the image in this collection is one that is less familiar, but just as amazing as the ones we all know and love. I am hard pressed to select favorites, as there are just so many that are wonderful. This is why I keep coming back to this collection; I can use it as a guidepost to look for things we might like, and use it as an encouragement not to settle for weaker work that we might come across.

Go out and find this book for your library!

As I mentioned above, Part 2 of this post, with another 6 collection books, will come along sometime in the next week or so. And if I have missed any great collection books (collectors up to the letter S), please post them in the Comments.

Auction Results: Phillips, Christie’s and Sotheby’s recent sales

There are plenty of places online where you can get summary auction results, and both Alex Novak and Stephen Perloff do a great job of giving the blow by blow of what happened during the major sales in their newsletters, so there is no need to duplicate either of those efforts here. Instead, I thought I would take off my art appreciation hat for the moment and put on my business hat and do some statistical analysis of the sales results to see if we can discern any patterns or draw any interesting conclusions from what has happened so far. I’ve used the data from the first three sales of the season that included photography (Saturday @Phillips London, Christie’s First Open, and Sotheby’s Contemporary Art).

While overall aggregate numbers from the sales can tell us something (and we’ll get to those in a minute), I want to lay out some more explicit definitions for how I have sliced and diced the data. I’ve divided the photography market into three categories, as defined by lots that have certain high estimate prices prior to the sale. These ranges are:

Low: $10000 and under for the high estimate
Mid: between $10000 and $50000 for the high estimate
High: above $50000 for the high estimate

While we might quibble about where these break points are, I think they generally reflect the behavior of the majority of buyers. (For the London sale, executed in pounds, I have converted to dollars to make the items comparable.) So for each sale, I have divided the photography lots into these groups, tallied estimates, actual sales, and buy ins, and then generated some comparative percentages. (Blogger doesn’t seem to support tables or charts, so please bear with the row by row data presenatation below.)

So let’s start with Christie’s:

Total Lots 238
Photo Lots 29
Photo Lot % 12.18%
Photo Lots Sold 21
Photo Lots Bought In 8
Photo Buy In % 27.59%

Total Sale Total $6507800
Photo Sale Total $1368250
Photo $ % 21.02%

So given that the photography accounted for 12% of the lots but 21% of the sales, the contemporary photography clearly held its own in this sale.

Now the segmentation:

Low Total Lots 6
Low Sold 4
Low Bought In 2
Buy In % 33.33%

Total Low Estimate $46000 (the sum of all the high estimates of these specific lots)
Total Low Sold $62500 (the sum of the actual sales for these specific lots)

Mid Total Lots 21
Mid Sold 16
Mid Bought In 5
Buy In % 23.81%

Total Mid Estimate $431000
Total Mid Sold $403250

High Total Lots 2
High Sold 1
High Bought In 1
Buy In % 50.00%

Total High Estimate $570000
Total High Sold $902500

My conclusions from this data are that the Low and Mid ranges did quite well in this sale, and Cindy Sherman carried the High (her one lot sold for the entire High sum) and made the total numbers look even better overall. I’m guessing the folks at Christie’s are generally happy with this.

Here’s Sotheby’s:

Total Lots 418
Photo Lots 21
Photo Lot % 5.02%
Photo Lots Sold 18
Photo Lots Bought In 3
Photo Buy In % 16.67%

Total Sale Total $10556940
Photo Sale Total $286875
Photo $ % 2.72%

In this sale, the contemporary photography did not pull its weight (lot % higher than sale %), but in general it was a small number against the whole.

Here’s the segmentation:

Low Total Lots 6
Low Sold 4
Low Bought In 2
Buy In % 33.33%

Total Low Estimate $45000
Total Low Sold $23125

Mid Total Lots 15
Mid Sold 14
Mid Bought In 1
Buy In % 6.67%

Total Mid Estimate $266000
Total Mid Sold $263750

There were no High lots in this sale. So here, the Low end didn’t perform well, but the Mid range was solid.

And finally Phillips (converted to dollars):

Total Lots 454
Photo Lots 96
Photo % 21.15%
Photo Lots Sold 59
Photo Lots Bought In 37
Photo Buy In % 38.54%

Total Sale Total $1173326
Photo Sale Total $251208
Photo $ % 21.41%

In this sale, even with a high buy-in percentage, the photography appeared to carry its weight, with the lot % and the sale % almost exactly equal.

Here’s the segmentation:

Low Total Lots 87
Low Sold 54
Low Bought In 33
Buy In % 37.93%

Total Low Estimate $318200
Total Low Sold $173708

Mid Total Lots 9
Mid Sold 5
Mid Bought In 4
Buy In % 44.44%

Total Mid Estimate $164000
Total Mid Sold $77500

There were no High lots in this sale. These numbers show that both the Low and Mid ranges underperformed in this sale, and the buy-in rates were high. This must have been a bit of a disappointment for Phillips.

So what does all this tell us? Here are a few potential conclusions about the market, potentially supported by the very few data points above:

  • The High end is still hot, driven by the trophy lots that continue to get bid up.
  • The Mid range seems generally solid across the board, with pockets of weakness based on variation in material.
  • The Low end seems to have more pervasive uncertainty and softness, again driven by variation in the quality of material up for sale.

If you draw other conclusions or think I should consider other ways to look at the data, that’s what the Comments section is for…

Photography on Photography: Reflections on the Medium since 1960 @the Met

JTF (just the facts): 22 artists represented by one work each (although some contain multiple images or a series), displayed in the Joyce and Robert Menschel Hall, a large white box of a room with a high ceiling. Here’s a list of the artists in the show (alphabetically):

Vito Acconci
William Anastasi
Lutz Bacher
Sarah Charlesworth
Moyra Davey
Liz Deschenes
Roe Ethridge
Kota Ezawa
Janice Guy
Sherrie Levine
Robert Mapplethorpe
Allen McCollum
Richard Prince
Josephine Pryde
Thomas Ruff
Allen Ruppersberg
Karin Sander
Hiroshi Sugimoto
Andy Warhol
James Welling
Christopher Williams
Mark Wyse

Comments/Context: The new contemporary photography gallery is probably the only place (save the special exhibits areas) in the hallowed halls of the Met where some real risk taking in exhibit making can take place. The art in this room hasn’t necessarily weathered the trials of decades or centuries, and any one work may or may not have yet risen to the top as best of breed for a certain style or time period. It’s a place where fresh ideas can be shown, providing interesting contrasts to what’s on view elsewhere in museum.

This exhibit takes on the challenge of making sense of the entire sweep of photography since the 1960s. Some of the themes it touches on include:

  • Appropriation/rephotography
  • The idea of truth in photography
  • Conceptual photography
  • Photography as a ubiquitous mass medium
  • Photographic advertising
  • New and old photographic processes

This is a small gallery remember, and therefore a relatively limited place in which to tell the stories of all these individual movements/concepts coherently. As a result, I’m sorry to say that this exhibit had a random “dressed in the dark” feel for me. I felt I had to engage each work and play the guessing game of which theme this particular image was trying to represent – “why is this here” for each and every picture or series of images. With some effort, these puzzles can be deciphered and the audience can see the thought process behind the exhibit; it just takes some work, and I’m guessing that 80% of the fly-by viewers who stroll through these galleries on their way to someplace else will leave mystified. While the mix of established artists and unknowns is a good thing, there was just so much going on that the juxtapositions of different works didn’t seem to make much sense (I bet this will be the first and only time that a Sugimoto portrait and a Welling flower will hang next to each other; see the Welling image at right, 012 Flowers, 2006). Given the size of this space, any one of the themes mentioned above could fill this room with an interesting and representative array of work to tell its particular story more thoroughly. So while risks are good, perhaps some tighter focus is required.

As an aside, there are two entrances to this room, that are nearly equally likely for someone to come through. This exhibit was arranged generally chronologically, so if you came in through the far doors are worked back (as I did), it seems even more of a grab bag, until you get to the other end, where the historical context is more obvious. I think the lesson here is that this room does not lend itself well to a linear narrative, and shows need to be monolithic in this space.

Collector’s POV: For our particular collection, there were really only a couple of works that would fit well. The first is the flower image I referenced above by James Welling. This is a large image, hearkening back to various hand crafted processes of the past, but fully rooted in the present and with a strong point of view. If we had a wall big enough, I could imagine one of these in our collection.

A second is Mark Wyse’s Mark of Indifference #1 (Shelf) from 2006 (see image at right). This artist was previously unknown to me, but I liked the simplicity of the vision.

While not a fit for us, I think the Sugimoto wax figure portraits in general (there is one of Fidel Castro in this show) are both thought provoking and spectacular. My guess is that they will end up being truly signature pieces from this era.

Rating: * (1 star) GOOD (rating system defined here)

Photography on Photography: Reflections on the Medium since 1960
Through October 19th

Metropolitan Museum of Art
1000 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10028

Upcoming Lectures and Courses

Here are three upcoming lectures and courses of interest to collectors:

1.) Collector’s Workshop: Introduction to Affordable Photography Panel Discussion @Aperture

Panelists:
Kellie McLaughlin (Aperture Limited Edition Photographs Program)
Amani Olu (Humble Arts Foundation)
Ruben Natal-San Miguel (collector/blogger ARTmostfierce)

Tuesday, September 16, 2008
6:30PM

Aperture Gallery
547 West 27th Street
4th floor
New York, NY

2.) Aspects of Photography @Christie’s Education

This is a short course, including 4 nights of lectures (one at the NY Public Library collection) and a sale walk through with one of the specialists. The course plans to “look at photography from different angles including a history of processes and photography’s place within contemporary art”.

September 12-October 12, 2008
$450

3.) The Photographers Lecture Series @ICP

This is a 10 week series of evening talks, given by photographers who show/discuss their work. Here’s the schedule:

October 1: Susan Meiselas, In History
October 15: Jeff Liao, From the 7 Train
October 22: Tierney Gearon, Family
October 29: Morten Andersen, Never is Forever
November 5: Arno Rafael Minkkinen, Saga
November 12: Thomas Holton, People
November 19: Ed Kashi, Black Gold
December 3: Andrew Bush, Stories
December 10: Lynn Saville, At Night
December 17: Burk Uzzle, Social Landscapes

$155/$130 for members

You can see some highlights of past lectures here. The talks by Joan Fontcuberta and Vik Muniz are worth checking out.

International Center of Photography (school)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Four Summer @Benrubi

JTF (just the facts): This is a group show of four gallery artists: Pamela Hanson, Peter C. Jones, Jeffrey Milstein, and Lindy Smith, shown in the entrance area and main gallery space. Here’s a quick rundown on each:

  • Pamela Hanson: 14 images, 2 in color, the rest in black and white. Mostly of fashion/models. Ranging from 11×14 to 24×30.
  • Peter C. Jones: 8 images, all in color, 20×20. Window scenes/florals/summer landscapes.
  • Jeffrey Milstein: 7 images, all in color, varying sizes from 20×20 to 50×50. Images of airplanes from below and head-on, against white backgrounds.
  • Lindy Smith: 5 works, some single images, some diptychs or triptychs. Floral Kallitypes

Comments/Context: One of the big trends of the last decade has been, in the face of the relentless move to digital, the revival of many antique photographic processes, focusing on the hand crafted nature of image making. Artists have taken these old processes and applied them to new and different subject matter and come up with exciting new work that references the history of the medium.

Lindy Smith has taken an abandoned 19th process, the Kallitype, and resurrected it to make larger scale floral images. (see the installation photo at right.) The Kallitype is a cameraless process, where paper is coated with iron salts and silver nitrate and then exposed to the sun (much like the cyanotype, but with different chemistry). The interaction between the chemicals and the plants/flowers she lays down on the sheets creates some unpredictability in the final colors, generating a whole nuanced spectrum of browns, yellows and oranges. The resulting images are quiet, intricate, and lovely.

These pictures however raise for me a larger question about what happens when an artist heads down a path well worn by previous artists. Starting with William Henry Fox Talbot and Anna Atkins in the mid 19th century, and then moving forward to Bertha Jaques (see here) in the early 1900s (and many others since then), the concept of the simple silhouetted botanical image has been around for a long time, and these original artists set the standard and defined the playing field for everyone that has followed. How does an artist innovate and bring a new point of view to subject matter that has already be “done”?

In the world of music, we have seen the emergence of the “retro” and “neo” prefixes, attached to new work that either seeks to emulate the old sounds in full or to take those old sounds and recast them in a new light, while still staying recognizable as the old form. In Soul music, we might call Sharon Jones and the Dap Kings “Retro Soul” and someone like Amy Winehouse “Neo Soul”. Perhaps the artists themselves hate these kinds of characterizations, but these terms help audiences understand where the music is coming from and what it might be trying to accomplish.

So back to photography. Should we call Chuck Close’s recent portraits “Neo Daguerreoptyes“? No one would ever confuse what Close has done with portraits from the 19th century using the same medium; his artistic viewpoint is clear. Or what about these Lindy Smith florals? “Retro botanicals“? I wonder if her viewpoint comes through prominently enough; the works are clearly beautiful and well made, but are they a ground breaking new voice or a riff on the past? And if the artist’s perspective isn’t as strong or obvious, will “retro” style work stand the test of time? Will it be forgotten or enjoyed as something wonderfully familiar and comfortable?

In general, I like these Lindy Smith images for what they are and can imagine adding a small one to our collection. But go and check out the work yourself and make your own judgement.

Collector’s POV: The Lindy Smith works range in price from $3500 for the single images, up to $12000 for the triptychs, and of course, they are unique prints (edition of 1).

As an aside, my eight year old son would love the work of Jeffrey Milstein in this show. (see installation photo at right.) This is meant as a high compliment, not a slight. My son would love the large, colorful shots of airplanes and would beg to have one in his room if he saw them in person. Ranging from $2600-6000 depending on size, that isn’t going to happen any time soon, but the works are striking and would work well in large contemporary spaces.

Rating: * (1 star) GOOD (rating system defined here)

Four Summer
Through September 20th

Bonni Benrubi Gallery
41 East 57th Street
13th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Selections from the Permanent Collection @MoMA

JTF (just the facts): Over 200 images, spread across 5 rooms. The prints are grouped together by artist/subject matter, exhibited in roughly chronological order. Here is a quick run down on each room, with the artists represented, the number of images displayed (in parentheses) and the subject matter of those images:

Room 1:
Bernard (8) Sherman’s campaign
Blancard (5) Eiffel Tower
Muybridge (10) Motion studies
Kasebier (3) Mother and child
Stieglitz/White (4) Nudes

Room 2:
Modotti (3) Abstractions
Stieglitz (3) Hands
Weston (8) Nudes
A. Adams (4) Geysers
Moholy-Nagy (2) Portraits
Rodchenko (3) Portraits
Sander (12) Portraits
Atget (6) Staircases
Albers (2) Portraits

Room 3:
Strand (3) Houses
Anonymous/Vernacular (Many)
Brassai (4) Bar scenes
Lange (5) People
Callahan (5) Heads
Callahan (4) Reeds

Room 4:
Winogrand (14) Animals
Arbus (6) People
Friedlander (6) Self-portraits
Koudelka (11) Gypsies
Gedney (8) SF Hippies
R. Adams (10) Colorado development
Eggleston (4) Color

Room 5:
Bechers (21) Industrial facades
Groover (3) House parts – color
Horn (5) Water
Spano (2) People
Struth (4) Buildings – b&w
Dane (postcards)
Shore (postcards)
Ruscha (Sunset Strip book)

Comments/Context: While collecting photography has become over the past decade or two a priority for museums of all sizes across the country, only a handful that I can think of (MoMA and SFMoMA are two of the best) treat photography on a somewhat even footing with paintings or sculpture by dedicating a relatively consistent space for displaying highlights from the permanent collection. Carving out this space allows (and forces) the curators to continually revisit the collections and rediscover ways to use the images on hand to tell stories about the nature of the medium.

As I walked through this exhibit, I was reminded of all the talk that surrounded the rehanging of the permanent collection of paintings and sculpture when the MoMA reopened after its recent renovations. Given the museum’s prominence, many considered the installation of the permanent collection to be a very important commentary on the history of art, and there was much learned debate and detailed review of very single work included (and omitted).

The primary structural device in this hanging of the photography collection is grouping via common subject matter, although not necessarily a particular photographer’s iconic work. I started to think to myself: what would the paintings galleries look like if they were hung with this same structure? A grouping of Cezanne fruit still lives, a bunch of Picasso cubist guitars, a few Matisse portraits of women near windows, and a group of Van Gogh agricultural landscapes, on separate walls, all in one room, as an example. What do we make of such an exhibit? Or a couple of Pollock drip paintings, a handful of small Newman zips, some De Kooning women, and a group of Kline black and white paintings, all in one room? My feeling is that for paintings, using subject matter (even if it is abstract) as the driving force behind the categorization misses much about differing artists’ stylistic approaches and ends up being overly reductive and potentially misleading about the broader sweep of art history.

And yet, I think this approach works quite well for the photography. And while this particular hanging of the collection has some uneven spots (the first and last galleries seem less tightly focused than the ones in the middle), in general, I think these groups of images deliver a coherent narrative about the evolution and forward progression of photography over time and show us that the great work of many photographers was not limited to a few masterpiece images. It also reminds us that by its very nature, photography has always lent itself to the “project”, “album” or group of related photographs that together tell a multi-faceted and more robust story than a single image would – a single Atget staircase might seem random; 6 hung together give us theme and variation and end up making a more interesting comment on Parisian life of that period. Sequences and recurring motifs are much easier to execute in photography than in any other medium.

So while the organizational concept of this exhibit does lead to some “jumpiness” and the feeling of some gaps here and there, it does a terrific job of showing off what is exciting and amazing about photography. An audio guide would be a welcome addition, to hear more detail/context about the various artists and their work (especially in the last gallery, which feels more like a grab bag).

Collector’s POV: As collectors who organize our collection using subject matter genres, this show had some perfect matches for us. There were several groups of pictures I would gladly take home lock, stock and barrel and which would fit snugly into our view of the world:

  • The 8 small Weston 4×5 nudes from 1933/34. (seen at right) We have one nude from this series in our collection (see here), and we would very much like to find others that we like and could afford, but there just aren’t that many floating around in the marketplace.
  • The 3 Stieglitz portraits of hands. These are spectacular, and would fit well with other nudes we own. Unfortunately, these are both not available and far removed from anything we could realistically add to our collection.
  • The 3 Strand images of houses (seen at right). Again, these are truly amazing images that would easily fit in our city/industrial genre. However, they too are far out of reach.
  • I also thought the Modotti abstractions, the Callahan heads, and the Friedlander self-portraits were all tremendous, even if they don’t quite fit what we collect today.

Overall, the folks at MoMA should be commended for continuing to so explicitly support all kinds of photography, and you should visit this show from time to time to see how they are recasting and reinventing the history of the medium.

Rating: ** (2 stars) VERY GOOD (rating system defined here)

Museum of Modern Art
11 West 53rd Street
New York, NY 10019

Out of Town Museum Shows (Volume 1)

From time to time, we plan to generate a list of some of the museum shows that are on view elsewhere that we find of interest and wish we could see in person. (We will cover a similar group of out of town gallery shows/exhibits in a separate post at some point soon.) There are plenty of places to get an exhaustive roll call of exhibits across the nation and the world; our goal is to provide an edited group that highlights our point of view (listed in order of closing date, starting with soonest). We plan only to list shows that are open now.

1.) The Hunter Gifts @Norton Museum of Art
Through September 7th
2.) Peter Henry Emerson and American Naturalistic Photography @Minneapolis Institute of Arts
Through September 7th
3.) Out of The Shadow: Brett Weston @Phillips Collection
Through September 7th
4.) Basic Forms: Bernd & Hilla Becher and People of the Twentieth Century: August Sander @Getty Center
Through September 14th
5.) Philip LorcadiCorcia @LA County Museum of Art
Through September 14th

6.) Wildflowers of New England: Edwin Hale Lincoln @De Young Museum
Through September 21st
7.) Biographical Landscape: Stephen Shore @Haggerty Museum of Art
Through September 28th
8.) Beneath the Roses: Gregory Crewdson @Cincinnati Art Museum
Through October 5th
9.) Accommodating Nature: Frank Gohlke @Center for Creative Photography
Through October 26th
10.) Mexico: Edward Weston @Phoenix Art Museum

Through November 15th
11.) On Reading: Andre Kertesz @Portland Museum of Art
Through November 16th

If you are a collector and have seen or are planning to see any of these shows, please feel free to post a short review in the Comments section. We’d love to get a first hand view of how these show look and feel.

Auction Preview: Christie’s First Open Post-War and Contemporary Art, September 9, 2008

This post about Christie’s upcoming First Open Post-War and Contemporary Art sale can be considered a companion piece to last week’s post about Sotheby’s upcoming Contemporary Art sale, as they both contain the same type of slightly lower end work, and are scheduled to follow each other next week. More importantly, this sale also raises the same questions about the nature of “photography” in the context of Contemporary Art.

Of the 238 lots up for sale at Christie’s, I think 29 qualify as “photography” (broadly defined), as listed below:

Marina Abramovic, Rhythm 10, 1973/1994
John Baldessari, One and Three Fans (with Triadic Emotional Spread), 1993
Vanessa Beecroft, VBGDW, 2000
Sharon Core, Around the Cake, 2003
Lynn Davis, Jonas Salk Institute, 2000
Dan Graham, Ziggaurut, Skyscraper 1967 and Two Way Mirror, 1976
Dan Graham, Tract Housing, 1978 and New Housing Development, 1966
Roni Horn, Untitled (Fox), 2000
Alfredo Jaar, Guess Who Is Coming To Dinner, 1988
Anselm Kiefer, Snow, 1980
Louise Lawler, Objects, 1985
Vera Lutter, Pepsi Rooftop, Vent and Logo, August 8, 2000, 2000
Yasumasa Morimura, Self-Portrait (Actress) after Liza Minelli 1, 1996
Shirin Neshat, Rapture Series, 1999
Shirin Neshat, I am its Secret, 1993
Thomas Ruff, Substrat 7III, 2002
Cindy Sherman, Untitled Film Still #13, 1978
Laurie Simmons, Lying Fountain, 1991
Laurie Simmons, The Music of Regret X, 1994
Lorna Simpson, Untitled (cabin in the sky), 2001
Mike and Doug Starn, X, 1989
Thomas Struth, Tokyo, Tokyo Fair, 1999
Ruud van Empel, World #9, 2005
John Waters, Three Sirk Mirrors, 1998
Wang Qingsong, Another Battle #7, 2001
Carrie Mae Weems, Sea Island Series, 1992
Weng Fen, Staring at the Lake 2, 2005
Zhang Huan, To Raise The Water Level In A Fish Pond (Waterchild), 1997
Zhang Huan, Foam, 1998

If we take this list of artists and merge it with the one from the Sotheby’s sale, I think we would have the beginnings of a solid list of the key crossover artists at work today.

To our eyes, the standout lot in this sale, by a very large margin, is the cover image, Cindy Sherman’s Untitled Film Still #13, 1978. This image is one of the best of the film stills and is a unique print; it could easily have gone in the high end VIP only evening sale given the interest in her work, which begs the question why it is here. For our collection, the Vera Lutter (one of our favorites) and the two diptychs by Dan Graham would be the best fits.

A few other random thoughts triggered by this catalog:

  • Contemporary Chinese photography has clearly established itself in the mainstream. And yet it doesn’t seem that from a scholarly point of view that this work has been assimilated into the entire narrative of the history of photography. I’d like to have this work placed in context a bit more to understand it better.
  • Even though the Photography sales coming in October will have some of the same artists (if not the same exact images), none of the pages in the back used for promoting future sales are used for photography. This was true as well in the Sotheby’s catalog. This is a puzzler to me.
  • The Christie’s Buyer’s Premium thresholds have been raised in tandem with those at Sotheby’s. This catalog has the step down thresholds at $50,000 and $1,000,000 versus $20,000 and $500,000 (where they were in the spring sales).

First Open Post-War and Contemporary Art
September 9, 2008

Christie’s
20 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020

Auction Preview: Saturday @Phillips, London, September 6, 2008

JTF (just the facts): Out of a total of 454 lots in this sale, I counted 96 lots of photography, mostly contemporary works. Here’s the highly eclectic list of photographers represented in the sale (many completely unknown to us):

Nobuyoshi Araki
Eve Arnold
Miriam Backstrom
Vanessa Beecroft
Christian Boltanski
Frank Breuer
Danielle Buetti
Jeff Burton
Martino Coppes
Tim Davis
Carl De Keyzer
Thomas Demand
Gotz Diergarten
Tracey Emin
Jenny Gage
Claus Goedicke
Douglas Gordon
Rodney Graham
Tim Hailand
Jitka Hanzlova
Naoya Hatekeyama
Eberhard Havekost
Frances Kearney
Alberto Korda
Idris Khan
Daniel Kramer
Luisa Lambri
Louise Lawler
Ryuiji Miyamoto
Liliana Moro
Eadward Muybridge (what’s he doing in here?)
Helmut Newton
Seamos Nicolson
Walter Niedermayer
Michael James O’Brien
Tod Papageorge
Martin Parr
Richard Prince
Rankin
Gerhard Richter
Mick Rock
Daniela Rossell
Thomas Ruff
John Schabel
Roy Schatt
Wilhelm Schurmann
Mark Seliger
Andres Serrano
Yinka Shonibare
Alice Springs
Hannah Starkey
Beat Streuli
Jock Sturges
Hiroshi Sugimoto
Wolfgang Tillmans
Massimo Vitali
Celine Van Balen
Bernard Venet
Bettina Von Zweil
John Waters
James Welling
Weng Fen
Anita Witek
Shizuka Yokomizu
Zhu Ming

Comments/Context: Saturday @Phillips is an intentionally mixed bag sale designed for newer/entry level collectors (I think). This sale has everything from contemporary paintings and prints to Japanese action figures and toys, with furniture, watches, and jewelry thrown in for good measure. Nearly all of the lots are low priced, so these sales can be a place to pick up a bargain or take a chance on something without breaking the bank.

Collector’s POV: While there are plenty of interesting lots in this particular sale, only a very few would really fit into our collection in any way. Here are three that would potentially work in our city/industrial genre:
    • Frank Breuer, Untitled, 2002: Frank Breuer was a student of the Bechers I believe. We have seen some of his recent work (telephone poles) and I like this image of cargo containers.
  • Wilhelm Schurmann, Genk, Belgium, 1978: This work is reminiscent of other 1970’s industrial/topographic photography. We’re not familiar with the photographer, but the image is strong.

 

  • James Welling, Glessner House Service Entrance, Chicago, Illinois, 1885-87, 1988: This is earlier architectural work by Welling, reminiscent of Szarkowski’s Louis Sullivan pictures. He has done some recent florals that are also of interest to us.

 

Saturday @ Phillips
September 6, 2008

Phillips De Pury & Company
Howick Place
London, SW1P 1BB

When Color Was New @Saul

JTF (just the facts): 38 mostly vintage works, hung in both the small entrance way and the larger, light filled gallery. (Installation shot, at right.) Negative dates range from 1936 (Outerbridge) to 1985 (Eggleston), though most are clustered in the 1970s. Here’s a list of the photographers included in the exhibit, with the number of works in parentheses:

Harry Callahan (2)
William Christenberry (2)
William Eggleston (2)
Mitch Epstein (1)
Walker Evans (1)
Luigi Ghirri (3)
Nan Goldin (2)
Dan Graham (1)
Jan Groover (2)
David Hockney (1)
Helen Levitt (2)
Joel Meyerowitz (4)
Paul Outerbridge (1)
Martin Parr (2)
John Pfahl (2)
Stephen Shore (2)
Arthur Siegel (2)
Joel Sternfeld (2)
Boyd Webb (2)
Terry Wild (2)

Comments/Context: After spending some time with this exhibition, my conclusion is that the time “when color was new” was a mixed bag, a chaotic period of experimentation, with an appropriately uneven selection of work produced. It seems as though each artist had his or her own challenges with “digesting” the new ideas color brought to the table. A few were successful in getting over to the other side, many failed, and another group abandoned the old ways and embraced the new. While different photographers experimented with different processes over a decently long period of time (where, by the way, is the representative autochrome?), it is clear that things really changed after Eggleston was canonized; the MoMA exhibit encouraged a whole generation of photographers to continue down a new road. Thirty years later, we now take color for granted.

A recurring thought for me as I looked at these pictures was that while some were clearly better than others, on the whole, this early work as a genre is under appreciated by collectors. I don’t think I can name a single collector who has a large, deep collection of this kind of work, although they must be out there somewhere (there isn’t a single color picture in our collection at the moment, but I think this will change over time). A few thoughts on a handful of the artists represented:

  • Shore: I think Shore will be the first color photographer in our collection. His work from this time was very consistently strong and is getting stronger with age. Looking at the images, you can see that he actually completely rethought how color influenced the process of picture making.
  • Evans: His late Polaroids are fun. I’d like to have a group/grid of these matted/hung together.
  • Parr: These pictures are deceptively well made, and resonate long after you have stopped smirking at the joke.
  • Pfahl: Why is this work forgotten? As an aside, we had a Pfahl that my mother bought hanging in our house when I was growing up. It was the one with strips of lace spread over the scrub brush, echoing the foam from the waves at the seashore (I don’t know the exact title off hand.) I always thought it was a puzzling and amazing image. I think the same for his other work; really unlike anyone else.
  • Sternfeld: While his work won’t fit as neatly into one of our genres, I think his pictures continue to be thought provoking, partly because of their use of color, partly because of their careful setting of scenes.
  • Callahan: I think his dye transfers are under appreciated. When I was first exposed to them, I didn’t think much of them, but as time has passed, I think they are standing up better than I had originally thought.

Another reaction I had to this show was that I need to force myself to be more attentive to the different color processes (carbo, chromogenic, dye transfer, Cibachrome, Polaroid etc.) and the nuances of their color palettes – they really are aging at different rates. Some seem dated; others seem fresh.

Collector’s POV: Prices in this show range from $1500 (Pfahl) to $50000 (Sternfeld), with the ever mysterious NFS (not for sale) obscuring the value of a few of the pictures (the iconic Eggleston in particular). I think Evans ($6000), and Shore ($8000-10000) seem close to reasonable for Chelsea retail. Christenberry ($6000) and Callahan ($8500) are higher than recent auction ranges for equivalent work. Joel Meyerowitz‘ work seemed astonishingly high to me ($16000-$45000), but I’m not following it closely.

All in all, this a worthwhile exhibit that gets you thinking about some work that may have drifted off your radar.

Rating: ** (2 stars) VERY GOOD (rating system defined here)

When Color Was New
Through September 6th

Julie Saul Gallery
535 West 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011

Lisette Model @Zabriskie

JTF (just the facts): 18 total images, 2 of which are duplicates. 12 of the images are from a 1976 Lunn portfolio of Model’s work; the other 4 are portraits of jazz musicians, including Louis Armstrong. The images were taken between 1933 and 1949, and measure approximately 19×15 or the reverse. (Installation shot of the gallery, at right.)

Comments/Context: Given the explosion in the Arbus market in recent years, I am glad to see some of that light being reflected back on Model who (as her predecessor and teacher) is deserving of more attention and respect. I think it is hard for us today to understand just how revolutionary Model’s portraits were for her times. Back in the late 1930s/early 1940s, the dominant portraiture was cool, detached, even distant, and sometimes heroic (think of the FSA photographers of this time). Her images are of imperfect, ordinary, and sometimes extraordinary people, with whom she has connected in a way to reveal their humanity, their dignity, and their humor (without mocking). I think that it was this willingness to “get involved” with her subjects, to meet them on their own terms without looking down on them, which was her true innovation, one which she happily passed on to a generation of photographers after her (especially Arbus, nearly 30 years later).

This small show does a good job of giving a viewer a feel for her approach to portraiture. (It closes tomorrow, so make haste in getting to see it.) While there is really only one semi-vintage piece in the exhibit, there are still many great pictures to see and be reminded of. I particularly like the only non-portrait in the show, Window Reflections, Fifth Avenue, New York City.

By the way, Model’s work can also be seen at Arbus/Avedon/Model, currently on at the ICP (see here). There are only 5 of her portraits in this small show (all of which are in the Zabriskie show I believe), but they are placed in the context of the work of the other two, which helps to clarify her influence on the photographers who came after her.

Collector’s POV: For collectors, there is a big gap between Model’s vintage and non-vintage work. Due to the relatively large number of later portfolios made (edition of 75 plus 15 APs), many have been broken up and sold off as individual images, depressing the prices a bit I imagine. At auction, later prints have gone in a range of $1000-5000 in recent years. The vintage work is another story: there has been very little that has come to market and those that have appeared have sold in a range between $25000-60000. Zabriskie is selling the entire 12 print 1976 portfolio for $65000. Other pictures in the show range from $7000-8500 for the more unknown jazz musicians up to $38000 for the 1950s print of Singer at the Cafe Metropole. These are, of course, Fuller Building retail kinds of prices.

Some questions to ponder about portfolios: when does a collector get large enough in his/her activities to be interested in buying entire portfolios of work? What is the right edition size for a portfolio, so that it is large enough to serve the audience of museums and large collectors, without flooding the market? And how many collectors get so big that they begin to support/subsidize the creation of specific portfolios of new work by their favorite photographers?

Rating: * (1 star) GOOD (rating system defined here)

Lisette Model
Through August 29th

Zabriskie Gallery
41 East 57th Street
New York, NY 10022

Sign up for our weekly email newsletter

This field is required.