Sheila Pinkel, Manifestations of a Cube, 1974-1979 @Higher Pictures

JTF (just the facts): A total of 8 photographic works and 1 film, variously framed and matted, and hung against white walls in the main gallery space and the entry area. The following works have been included in the show, with their processes, dates, and dimensions as background:

  • 1 set of photograms/gelatin silver prints, 1974-1978, framed together, each sized roughly 7×5
  • 1 set of 4 cyanotypes, 1976, each sized roughly 13×10
  • 1 set of 3 color xerox prints, 1976, each sized roughly 9×11
  • 1 set of photograms/gelatin silver prints, 1976-1977, displayed in plastic sleeves, sized overall 29×6 feet
  • 1 set of 9 color xerox prints, 1977, each sized roughly 4×3
  • 1 set of 4 xerox prints, 1977, each sized roughly 8×12
  • 1 16mm film, 5:36 minutes, 1977
  • 1 inkjet print, 1978/2010, sized roughly 8×6
  • 1 set of 3 xeroradiographs, 1978-1982, each sized roughly 9×13

(Installation shots below.)

Comments/Context: The process of artistic problem solving comes in as many shapes and sizes as there are artists, but for many, a fascination or obsession with a particular subject is the place where the roots can often take hold. For some, a model or muse provides the driving inspiration, while for others, a unique landscape or geography can be the setting for intense observation. In Sheila Pinkel’s case, starting in the mid-1970s, her attentions narrowed in on a modest and wholly unlikely object – a square glass dish taken from a Japanese restaurant – but her preoccupation with its mysteries blossomed into a series of investigations that used the humble cube to iteratively explore the undefined edges of image making technology.

Pinkel’s first discovery about her glass cube was that it was extremely uncooperative as a still life subject – she could never get exposures of the cube to behave in the same way. Photogram sessions in the darkroom would produce an unending stream of strange distortions and optical oddities. As the three dimensional form was flattened into two dimensions, the light would bend and fall in unexpected ways as it passed through the glass, casting elongated shadows or twisting the squared corners into inexplicable angles. Like a wild animal, her mundane glass cube refused to be tamed, thrashing around and fighting her every step of the way.

Pinkel’s approach to this stubbornness was to attempt to overwhelm the cube with methodical, patient iteration – she just kept making exposures, piling up the ethereal geometric outcomes as if she was trying to tire the anthropomorphized cube out. The results from this ongoing process were then organized into two large scale works that fill two full walls of this show. The largest work groups the photograms into patterns of similar or sequential compositions and then arranges them into a linear rhythm that plays out in plastic sleeves affixed to the wall. The effect is something akin to the stuttering jumps and blasts of a percussive musical score, with the cube bouncing and jumping as it moves around, its edges morphing with each frame. A second work constrains another group of photograms into a more rigid framed typology, the cube wandering and rotating in a step-wise function as it struggles to resist Pinkel’s control.

These initial experiments with the cube were just the beginning. Pinkel made cyanotypes of the cube, where the form appears to melt and pour away. She took her photograms of the cube and photocopied them using black and white and color Xerox technology, smearing the pages across the scanning bed, misaligning the various color layers, and letting her hands show through. She projected the cube image onto the bed of the Xerox machine, creating psychedelic distortions and inversions of color. And she even tried the x-ray technology of xeroradiography, making light blue images of the cubes with more surface texture and three dimensional depth. With each successive project, we can see Pinkel testing the cube in new ways, trying to use the object to push into new aesthetic realms.

This process of recursion and reuse continued in a 1977 short film called Intuition, where Pinkel took a photogram of the cube, and using the computing system at the USC School of Engineering Image Processing Laboratory, performed an evolving sequence of color transitions on the underlying image. With an eerie soundtrack of plonking distorted water drops, the image wanders through continuous gradient changes and step wise positive and negative color spectra. At moments, the cube looks like a TV set or a Rothko abstraction, only to dissolve back into an endless reverberating oscillation of colors. That the original glass dish could be the basis for this cutting-edge film (it was the first digital film made in the lab) is mind-bending, as Pinkel has put the form through so many transformations that it is hardly recognizable.

The persistent intelligence in this ongoing project is what makes it innovative and durably original. Pinkel has systematically deconstructed the glass cube, and used it as the basis for a thoughtful series of technologically-based artistic experiments. In each case, whether in the darkness of the darkroom or looking down at the scanner bed of a Xerox machine or feeding data into a first generation digital imaging system, she was making a calculated leap of faith, allowing chance and the rudiments of the various technologies to influence the trajectory of the artistic outcomes. And even when she didn’t emerge with something ground-breaking, she kept pursuing the cube, long after anyone thought she should keep going. To me, that says her mind was still actively processing the problems of the cube, and seeing others emerge just as the first and second and third were knocked down. She kept digging even when she could stand in the hole, and the sum total of that exhaustive effort shows us something compelling about the way an ordered artistic mind engages with a tantalizing and elusive subject.

Collector’s POV: All of the works in this show are being sold together as a single unique set, priced at $90000. Pinkel’s work has little secondary market history, so gallery retail remains the best option for those collectors interested in following up.

Send this article to a friend

Read more about: Sheila Pinkel, Higher Pictures Generation

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Articles

Vince Aletti, The Drawer @White Columns

Vince Aletti, The Drawer @White Columns

JTF (just the facts): A total of five rectangular tables, installed edge to edge with printed ephemera and covered with protective plastic. (Installation and detail shots below.) The Drawer was ... Read on.

Sign up for our weekly email newsletter