JTF (just the facts): A total of 49 color images, displayed as 8 sequences of between 4 and 9 images each, and two single images. All of the images were taken between 2004 and 2006. The prints are made in varying sizes, framed in white, without mats and with very little wall text, and hung at varying heights in a two room gallery with a single dividing wall. The curator of the exhibition is Susan Kismaric. (Installation shots at right.)
The new show at the MoMA takes a sampling from his most recent work, a shimmer of possibility, a group of images he took during many trips across America from 2004 to 2006. What is surprising is that this work is not a group of standard, stand alone documentary pictures. Instead, the images are sequenced into spare narratives, with almost cinematic slices of time (reframing the subjects minute to minute) propelling the stories along, sometimes quite linearly but often in a more elliptical undirected flow. - A woman eats takeout at a bus stop, and then smokes
- A man camps out near a Jack-in-the-Box trash can
- A girl with her toys on the sidewalk
- A man mows the grass, as it begins to rain
- Kids play basketball as the sun sets
- A man sells flowers on a street corner
- A man on a break savors a cigarette
The overall mood of these short stories is the same exhausted melancholy that permeates Alec Soth’s recent work. And yet, Graham’s economical narratives are oddly engaging and satisfying; the details all seem to matter a bit more. The exact moments when the rain falls on the man mowing the grass (sparkling in the sunlight), or when the smoker exhales, or when the basketball is released all have a hyper reality, saturated with our attention. And then there is a sense that life goes on – the open ended stories will all continue. While this show is relatively small, take your time to savor each thread; they’ll grow on you.The artist’s website can be found here. The 12 volume set of books published by Steidl can be found here.
New York, NY 10019




Graham may be less known in the US, but he’s very well appreciated in Europe, and has prices to match -those MoMA pieces are well into five figures. He doesn’t have a high powered US gallery, like Soth or Djikstra or DiCorcia, and that has cost him some recognition here, but hopefully MoMA will change that somewhat. He’s also listed for Deutsche Bourse prize this year, and deserves to win it.>>The comparison with Soth is useful, his ‘A1 The Great North Road’ work is similar to Soth’s ‘Sleeping by the Mississippi’ – a slice along the entire country using a road/river as an excuse + color + large format +mixes portrait and landscape, etc. Except that Graham did his work 20 years before Soth!
Thanks for the insightful and helpful comment. As I was writing the post, I originally had qualified that Graham was likely unknown among American collectors, but in the end I took out the word American and left it more general. But perhaps that was hasty, as clearly Graham is well known in Britain and more widely in Europe. >>It will be interesting to see if the MoMA show and the follow up at Greenberg Van Doren raise his profile to where it should be among a broader audience here. We’ll see.
Since Graham eschews the individual photograph (well, almost — see single large photo of styrofoam cup) in ‘shimmer of possibility,’ embracing instead a series of 4 or 5 photographs that comprise a single aesthetic unit, is that the “collectible unit” as well? If so, I assume that the specific sizes — and possibly the zig-zag display — are required as well if a collector wishes (as one assumes s/he would) to retain the artist’s intent.>>Graham seems part of a recent trend veering away from the single photograph as the accepted unit of aesthetic intent for “documentary” photographers. David Hilliard and JoAnn Verburg are two others that come to mind. >>BTW – Graham’s series of the man mowing the lawn is currently part of the Whitney’s small show entitled “Artists Making Photographs,” featuring photographs by Artists who use photography (eg, Warhol, Rauschenberg, Ruscha) as one of many media for their artistic output. That Graham was included among this bunch is a bit surprising, since I’ve always thought of him as, well, just a regular ol’ “photographer photographer.”>>Not to be cynical, but maybe it has something to do with eschewing the individual photograph . . . .